 |
|
|
|
|
| STATE
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT |
|
School
Improvement Framework
During the past year, the State Department of Education worked to
develop a universal framework for school improvement
that could be used by school districts and buildings to guide their
continuous improvement efforts. Designed to support school improvement
planning, the framework is aligned to with state and federal regulations,
including the No Child Left Behind Act, Public Act 25, and Education
Yes! Over the past several months, public feedback to the Framework
has been collected and incorporated in revisions to the original
draft document. Next step is to submit the Framework for national
review and comment. The State Board of Education is expected to
receive the final version of the Framework in December. In the meantime,
a rubric and a self reporting survey for schools to document progress
in supporting the framework that may be collected electronically
is currently being developed.
New
Accreditation Criteria?
The State Board of Education heard a report from the Michigan Department
of Education about possible changes to state school accreditation
under Education Yes! Currently, a school becomes unaccredited
only when it fails to make AYP and when its achievement scores would
yield a letter grade of F. What is proposed is a differentiated
accreditation system that combines letter grades for achievement
and labels for accreditation (accredited exemplary, accredited,
unaccredited improving and unaccredited). A lively discussion on
the topic at the State Board of Education meeting resulted in the
proposal going back to the Department of Education for further study
and development.
Zero
Tolerance and the Draft of the Model Code of Student Conduct
The Department of Education, at the request of the State Board of
Education, reviewed and revised the 2001 Model Code of Student Conduct.
The new document will be called the Model Code of Student
Conduct 2005 and will be available for public review and
comment. Revisions were made in four major areas:
-
Due process procedures (now available at the beginning of the
document)
-
School law updates since 2001
-
Promising practices reflecting school-wide approaches to achieve
appropriate student conduct, positive behavior supports and
interventions, and other effective pro-social choices currently
utilized by Michigan educators.
-
Collaboration leadership efforts that illustrate the significance
that a shared partnership between educators, students and parents
plays in the academic success of students.
Comments
from several State Board of Education members noted that guardians
and special education students were not referenced. They also felt
that the document could be couched in a more positive approach (i.e.
how students could be readmitted to school rather than why they
should not be readmitted to school). Student and parent advocacy
issues also seemed to be omitted.
Universal
Education
The State Board of Education has approved the Vision and
Principles of Universal Education as a policy framework
for the Department of Education and local and intermediate school
districts. The Visions and Principles are the work of the Universal
Education Referent Group (Michigan ASCD was a member). It supports
that each student deserves and needs an accepting educational community
that values diversity and provides for a comprehensive system of
supports from birth to adulthood. It is understood that the MDE
staff will return to the Board of Education with an introduction,
glossary and explanation of how the Vision and Principles can be
used by the State Board of Education and the Department Board of
Education as a framework for policy development.
Student
Behavior Standards for the Emergency Use of Seclusion and Restraint
report
A copy of a draft of this report can be found online.
The State Board of Education heard public comment that urged the
cautious use of seclusion and restraint.
New
High School Curriculum Requirements
Governor Jennifer Granholm has been calling for all high school
students in the state to be provided the same curriculum as part
of an effort to improve education quality and the number of students
with college degrees in Michigan. At its November 15th meeting,
the State Board of Education (after completing a study that included
reviewing the requirements of other selected states) will release
its proposed high school curriculum. A phase-in plan will
also be discussed. Currently, the only course requirement for graduation
as defined by state law is civics. One change the Department of
Education may make is that students take a math class each year
of high school. The Department indicated that they would not mandate
the sequence of classes, but could recommend the content that should
be in them. The Department is also looking at ways to weave applied
or career and technical learning programs into the core curriculum
classes of math, science, social studies and language arts.
Michigan
Department of Education (MDE) Request: Legislative Review of Kindergarten
Requirements
The MDE asked the Legislature to review whether school districts
should be required to provide full-day kindergarten and what should
be the appropriate age for mandatory school attendance.
Currently, 60% of the State’s school districts offer half-day
kindergarten programs when they are paid the full foundation allowance
for each of those children. The question of whether a school district
should be required to spend the full foundation allotment on each
child (they do not do this now) is an issued that is raised. Another
issue is whether 5-year-olds should be required to attend school.
While current law allows them to attend with state funding, children
are not required to attend school until they reach the age of 6.
Lindy Bush, director of the MDE Office of Early Childhood Education
and Family Services stated that half-day programs do not allow the
required time to meet the recommended kindergarten curriculum. She
indicated inconsistency in funding for kindergarten programs that
include some school districts having 2 year kindergarten programs
that are also paid for by state aid.
|
| STATE
LEGISLATIVE REPORT |
Restrictions
for New Drivers
HB
5133 would prohibit drivers 17 and younger
from talking on a cell phone while driving. This bill seems to have
wide support.
After
Labor Day Start for Schools
After almost 20 years of crusading, tourism interests succeeded
in having the legislature pass legislation that makes all schools
(including charter schools) open after Labor Day. Starting next
year, schools must open after Labor Day unless they have union contracts
that specify an earlier start. For them, post Labor Day school year
will begin after their contracts expire. Private schools, year-round
public schools and universities are not affected. Two years ago,
the state changed the law of requiring schools to offer at least
180 days of instruction to having schools provide 1,098 hours
of instruction. Lawmakers saw this as school districts
having more flexibility to conform to the law, even if they start
after Labor Day. Another motivating factor for lawmakers was the
continuing slump in tourism and its contribution to Michigan’s
stagnant economy.
Mandated
School Nutrition Policy
Proposed Senate Bill 91 would require a school district board or
the board of directors of a public school academy to adopt and implement
a local nutrition policy that would apply to food and beverage
products sold or distributed at school (classroom, cafeteria, lunchroom,
school bus, elsewhere on school premises or at a school –sponsored
activity or event whether or not it was held on school) that are
not part of a federally regulated child nutrition program.
Banned foods would include those that are classified by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture as having minimal nutritional value, that
have more than 30% fat calorie content , that have a 10% saturated
fat calorie content , that contain at least 40% sugar or other sweetener
by volume and juices that contain less than 50% fruit or vegetable
juice.
Michigan
Telecommunications Act
HB
5237 and SB
754 are bills to revise the Act which sunsets every 5 years.
While much of the legislation does not affect the education community,
there are a few subsections that do. Subsection 307
ensures that educational institutions can build and operate
their own fiber optic networks and that the costs of building
these networks can be partially mitigated by selling excess capacity.
The current bill would allow for government participation under
restricted rules and may prohibit educational institutions from
selling excess capacity.
2005-06
State Education Budget
See for www.michiganascd.org/Source/source102505/budget06.pdf
details.
|
FEDERAL
LEGISLATION |
Federal
Education Funding
Congress continues to work on its appropriations bills for Fiscal
Year 2006. It now appears that funds will be further cut
to pay for Hurricane Katrina relief funding. Additionally, there
are proposals for a 2% funding cut across the board for all federal
programs. The concern is that, if this does occur, that these funding
levels will not provide enough money to help school districts meet
the requirements of No Child Left Behind, or compensate for growing
student enrollments. The potential funding shortfall may prevent
schools from hiring more teachers or expanding learning resources
for students. Even more damaging, existing programs may need to
be cut or eliminated if these proposals are approved
Education
Proposal for Families and Schools Impacted by Hurricanes
The U.S. House Education and Workforce Committee unveiled
a proposal that would create Family Education Reimbursement
Accounts to allow families and schools to provide direct
reimbursement to schools on behalf of students displaced by the
storms. Under the plan, parents would register through the internet
with an independent contractor for the family for use by each child
(for up to $6,700 per child) from pre-K to 12th grade. Parents would
then provide their account number to the school enrolling the child
and the school would use that information to be reimbursed on behalf
of the child. The schools could be public, private or charter
schools.
|
|
U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (USDE) |
New
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Policy for Hurricane Affected Schools.
Under current law, schools and districts affected by natural disasters
are not required to move forward in the NCLB Annual Yearly Progress
(AYP) school improvement timeline. Thus, schools in Louisiana, Mississippi,
Texas, Alabama, and Florida that have sustained significant damage
or closure time related to the hurricanes may delay the
AYP for this school year. Additionally, the USDE will consider
waivers for districts and schools that have enrolled large numbers
of displaced students. Another option would be to have states, schools
and districts affected by hurricanes to apply for waivers to allow
for the establishment of a separate subgroup of
displaced students (this student would only appear in this subgroup
and not any other subgroup)
NCLB
Tutoring Rules Tightened
Decisions in Florida by the U.S. Department of Education, if implemented
nationwide, would bar groups affiliated with school systems rated
“in need of improvement” from participating in the tutoring
program mandated under NCLB. Entities likely to be barred from the
program include teacher unions, child-care centers, after-school
programs, voc-ed or computer centers, and parent groups. This reaffirms
the USDE’s position that no district in need of improvement
is allowed to serve as its own supplemental education services (SES)
provider. It also further clarifies that the prohibition also applies
to groups and programs affiliated with such school programs. The
option for school systems is to provide private, third-party tutors
for these pupils. The move is a potential boon for private, third-party
providers nationwide.
Survival
Guide for New Teachers
The U.S. Department of Education's new online tome for beginning
educators is available free of charge on ED's web site. "Become
a Teacher: Survival Guide for New Teachers" features a number
of resources for rookie educators. Readers will confront a whole
host of issues currently affecting the modern classroom--from cultivating
effective professional relationships to reaching difficult students.
While the resource won't teach young educators how to run their
classrooms, it should help as they try to make the difficult transition
from student to teacher.
www.ed.gov/teachers/become/about/survivalguide/
|
Congress
continues to work on its appropriations bills for Fiscal Year 2006.
Although both the House and Senate approved education funding bills
earlier this year, it now appears that funds will be further cut.
These cuts will occur in part to pay for Hurricane Katrina relief
funding. Additionally, there are proposals for a two percent funding
cut across all federal programs.
In July, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved a bill with
only meager education increases. Most programs were level-funded
or received minor increases. The total increase for the Department
of Education is $143 million, which is only slightly greater than
the level approved by the House—and only a fraction of a percent
greater than the previous year’s levels.
ASCD is concerned about that. We continue to monitor action on education
funding and will provide updates as new information arises.
Senate
Labor, Health, Human Services, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee
FY 2006 Spending Bill
Funding Levels for Selected Education Programs (In Millions)
| Selected
Education Programs |
FY
05
Enacted |
FY
06
Senate Subcommittee
Difference |
Difference
From FY 05 |
Percent
Change
Over FY 05 |
| Title I
Grants to Local Education Agencies |
$12,740.00
|
$12,840.00 |
$100.00
|
0.78% |
| Special
Education Grants to States |
$10,590.00 |
$10,690.00 |
$100.00 |
0.94% |
| Teacher
Quality State Grants |
$2,916.00
|
$2,916.00 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Perkins
Career and Technical Education |
$1,326.60 |
$1,309.00 |
-$17.60 |
-1.33%
|
| Reading
First Grants to States |
$1,041.60
|
$1,041.60
|
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| English
Language Acquisition |
$675.80
|
$675.80
|
$0.00 |
0.00% |
If you would like information about funding for specific programs
not included in this summary chart, please email Dan Fuller, ASCD
Public Policy Director, at dfuller@ascd.org
To receive updates on education policy via email, please sign up
for the ASCD Educator Advocates E-List.
|
The
Source is a free service to Michigan ASCD
members |
Michigan
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
1001 Centennial Way, Suite 300
Lansing, MI 48917-9279
517-327-9259 |
|