| Mandatory
High School Curriculum Requirements
State Superintendent Mike Flanagan informed the State Board of Education
that adding 18 mandatory credits to the
high school curriculum has generally received good editorial
and media support throughout the state. The high school
curriculum requirements need to be passed by the legislature by
March 1, 2006 to implement them for the next school year. To view
the 18 credit recommendations, go to www.michiganascd.org/resources/HSrequirements121305.pdf.
School
Improvement Framework Approved
The State Board of Education approved the School improvement Framework
which is slated to be implemented a year from now.
Workshops in the spring are scheduled to explain the purpose and
use of the Framework. See www.michiganascd.org.
Proposed
State Technology Plan
A report on the new Michigan’s Educational Technology Plan
was presented and discussed. Representatives of many educational
associations and groups (Michigan ASCD included) developed the plan
which is expected to be adopted at a future board date. All members
of the State Board of Education agreed that funding for implementation
of the plan is going to be a major problem.
www.michiganascd.org/resources/TechPlan122105.pdf
Performance
Standards Approved for MEAP/MI-Access
The State Board unanimously approved performance standards for the
new Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) and MI-Access
test. The standards determine the level of student performance
in English for grades 3 through 8 and for science in grades 5 and
8 and social studies in grades 6-9. Under federal law, both MEAP
and MI-Access had to have grade level assessments in grades 3-8
by the fall. MEAP will have 4 levels of performance: exceeds state
standards; met state standards; basic; and apprentice. For MI-Access,
there are three levels of performance: surpassed the performance
standard; attained the performance standard; and emerging toward
the performance standard.
Ed Roeber , Director of the Office of Educational Assessment and
Accountability, cautioned that changes in test scores from last
year cannot be validly interpreted as measures of a student’s
growth due to the many changes that have occurred form the last
time the standards were recommended until now: changes in content
and design of the tests; the change from spring to fall testing;
the number of grades that are assessed; and the additional uses
of assessment data.
www.michiganascd.org/resources/MEAP-MIaccess122105.pdf
Approval
of the Michigan Educational Technology Standards for grades 9-12
For
the 2006 school year, the State Board of Education focus will include
teacher preparation standards and technology.
|